<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Philosophy on Mikael Ståldal&#39;s technical blog</title>
		<link>https://www.staldal.nu/tech/category/philosophy/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Philosophy on Mikael Ståldal&#39;s technical blog</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.staldal.nu/tech/category/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>What is AI?</title>
				<link>https://www.staldal.nu/tech/2026/10/29/what-is-ai/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.staldal.nu/tech/2026/10/29/what-is-ai/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;definition&#34;&gt;Definition&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By Artificial Intelligence (AI), I specifically mean systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;how-we-should-understand-ai&#34;&gt;How we should understand AI&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There are many views on this. Some say it is just a statistical model and fundamentally just a computer program, though&#xA;a very complicated one. Others say it has intelligence comparable to a human, and perhaps even has a consciousness.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I think both these extremes get it wrong. On the one hand, you cannot reduce today&amp;rsquo;s LLM-powered AI systems to just a&#xA;statistical model and a regular computer program and believe that helps you understand it. On the other hand, I see no&#xA;reason to believe that today&amp;rsquo;s AI systems have human-like intelligence, let alone consciousness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
